MacBook screen type: why the difference is bigger than you think
Buying a MacBook without knowing what screen type it has? It happens more often than you think. Retina or non-retina —the confusion is complete when browsing through the years of MacBook models. Especially because Apple itself hasn't always communicated clearly about this transition. But here's the surprise: the difference between the two screen types isn't just reflected in the price of your accessories , but also determines which external devices you can connect. In fact, some older non-retina models outperform their retina-equipped successors for certain tasks—think part replacements or compatibility with first-generation AirPods . In this overview, we'll debunk the myth that newer is always better and show you why the screen type of your MacBook has more impact than you probably realize.
Useful links
The difference between retina and non-retina displays
The transition from non-retina to retina displays marked a turning point in the history of Apple's laptops. While traditional displays had a pixel density of around 110 pixels per inch, Apple doubled this to at least 220 pixels with retina displays. This difference is especially noticeable when reading text and viewing photos – letters are sharper, colors more vibrant, and details finer.
But the differences go beyond just image quality. Non-retina MacBooks often have a modular design, making the screen relatively easy to replace. Retina models have the display integrated into the lid, making repairs more expensive. This explains why a cracked screen on a 2011 MacBook Pro is cheaper to repair than on a 2015 retina model.
Non-retina MacBook model overview
The non-retina period stretched from 2006 to 2012. These devices had some advantages that we now lack:
13-inch MacBook Pro (2008-2012)
The 13-inch models from this period were characterized by their upgradeability. The RAM could be expanded up to 16GB, and the hard drive was easily replaced with an SSD. The 2012 model, often called the "mid-2012," remains popular among DIY enthusiasts because of this flexibility.
15-inch MacBook Pro (2006-2012)
The larger 15-inch models offered more connections than their successors. With FireWire, an Ethernet port, and a DVD burner, these machines were more versatile for professionals working with older equipment. The last non-retina model, from 2012, even still had an ExpressCard slot for expansion cards.
17-inch MacBook Pro (2006-2011)
The now-defunct 17-inch line was the workhorse for video editors and graphic designers. With a resolution of 1920x1200 pixels, this screen offered the most workspace at the time. Apple discontinued this line because retina technology reduced the need for physically larger screens.
The retina revolution from 2012
The first Retina MacBook Pro was released in mid-2012 as a 15-inch model. This laptop was thinner, lighter, but also more expensive than its predecessor. The fixed configuration meant you had to choose the amount of memory and storage you wanted at purchase—upgrading later wasn't an option.
12-inch MacBook (2015-2017)
This ultraportable model introduced some controversial choices. With only one USB-C port, users had to purchase adapters for even the most basic tasks. The butterfly keyboard, later notorious for its susceptibility to interference, debuted here. Despite these drawbacks, the 2304x1440 retina display was impressively sharp for such a compact device.
13-inch MacBook Pro retina era
The evolution of the 13-inch Pro shows three main stages:
- 2012-2015: First generation with two Thunderbolt 2 ports and HDMI
- 2016-2020: Touch Bar models with only USB-C/Thunderbolt 3
- 2020 M1: Apple Silicon with improved battery life but limited external display support
From 15-inch to 16-inch
The transition from 15 to 16 inches in 2019 meant more than just a larger screen. Apple listened to criticism and brought back the scissor keyboard, added a physical escape key, and improved cooling. The display grew without the laptop itself becoming significantly larger.
Practical considerations when making your choice
Compatibility with accessories
Non-retina models work flawlessly with older accessories like DisplayPort monitors and FireWire devices. Retina models often require dongles or hubs, especially versions from 2016 onward that only have USB-C. Connecting an external monitor to an M1 MacBook? Then you're limited to one additional screen, while Intel models can handle two.
Repair and maintenance
Maintenance costs vary considerably. With non-retina models, you can often replace a broken fan or battery yourself. Retina models require specialized knowledge and tools. A screen repair on newer models can cost up to half the purchase price of a refurbished one.
Performance for specific tasks
Surprisingly, some older non-retina models perform better for certain tasks. A 2012 non-retina MacBook Pro with upgraded RAM and SSD can boot faster than a 2015 retina model with similar specs. This is due to the SATA interface, which has less overhead for basic tasks.
Which screen type is right for you?
The choice between retina and non-retina depends on your priorities. For word processing and browsing, a non-retina screen is sufficient, especially if your budget is limited. Do you work with photos, video, or design? Then the investment in retina is worth it.
Students who primarily type and research can easily get by with an older non-retina model. Their robust build and repairability make these laptops ideal for those who don't need the latest and greatest. Professionals in creative industries, on the other hand, benefit from the superior color reproduction and sharpness of retina displays.
It's also important to consider the lifespan. Non-retina models no longer receive macOS updates, which poses security risks. Retina models from 2015 onwards still run recent versions of macOS, although they too are nearing end of support.
Finally, usability plays a role. The higher resolution of retina screens reduces eye strain during prolonged use. For people who spend hours each day at their laptop, this difference can be decisive for their comfort and productivity.
The right choice for your situation
The choice between a retina or non-retina MacBook ultimately comes down to more than just image quality. While non-retina models excel in repairability and upgradeability , retina MacBooks offer superior sharpness and modern features. For basic tasks, an older model is perfectly sufficient, but those who work with video daily will benefit from investing in a retina. Consider what you truly need: the latest technology or the flexibility of older models. Both options have their place, as long as they suit your workflow and budget .